Invasive versus Native Question

Discussions and news related to invasive and exotic species affecting our trees and forests.

Moderators: edfrank, dbhguru

User avatar
Lucas
Posts: 837
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2014 11:55 am

Re: Invasive versus Native Question

Post by Lucas » Tue Feb 23, 2016 9:05 pm

Erik Danielsen wrote:The potential for unforeseen consequences in simply adding a particular gene from a a closely related species that causes a minor chemical change that deters a certain fungus is vastly different than potential consequences of adding genes from bacteria to a widespread crop like corn that cause it to manufacture a powerful insecticide that makes its way into pollen that wind deposits on plant surfaces and in water that are used by a diversity of insects.
http://www.exchangemagazine.com/morning ... 021714.htm

A tactic I heard on the news today. One wonders how all these "bitter" leaves will affect the ecosystem. Good things eat trees, too.
We travel the Milky way together, trees and men. - John Muir

wisconsitom
Posts: 181
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:08 pm

Re: Invasive versus Native Question

Post by wisconsitom » Fri Feb 26, 2016 10:31 am

Will be a bigger boon to balsam fir than to spruce itself. Spruce budworm, while certainly capable of feeding on such relatively valuable species such as white spruce, is even more prevalent on balsam fir in big outbreak years. I would think too that this fungus is "native", so in that sense at least, it's not a new organism being unleashed. Still, you are correct in wondering just what the full range of effects might be. For my part-having spent much time in northern forests, I'd love to see less SBW damage...........but not at the expense of who-knows-what.

User avatar
Lucas
Posts: 837
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2014 11:55 am

Re: Invasive versus Native Question

Post by Lucas » Fri Jun 17, 2016 11:26 am

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2 ... 121530.htm

Garlic mustard populations likely to decline

Invasive plants are often characterized as highly aggressive, possessing the power to alter and even irreversibly change the ecosystems they invade. But a recent University of Illinois study shows that one such invader, garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata), actually becomes less aggressive over time.

"One of the things we've seen over the last 20 to 30 years is that garlic mustard becomes less of an issue, and actually balances out over time," says University of Illinois and USDA Agricultural Research Service ecologist Adam Davis.

When garlic mustard arrives in a new location, it releases a chemical known as sinigrin into the soil. Sinigrin is toxic to other plants and to the mycorrhizal fungi community, which other plants depend on to facilitate uptake of certain nutrients and water. Without their fungal partners, and through direct competition with growing garlic mustard populations for physical space, native plants quickly die out.

But when a garlic mustard population has been around for awhile, it produces less sinigrin.

"There's a fitness cost to producing sinigrin. So, when the native competitors drop out, it makes sense for garlic mustard to slow its production of this chemical," Davis explains.

In demonstrating the relationship between competition, an ecological phenomenon, and sinigrin production, an evolutionary phenomenon, the research team provided the first empirical example of a negative evolutionary feedback on an invasive species. That is, as garlic mustard populations become larger and more dense as a result of their superior competitive advantage, natural selection begins to act against the very mechanism that allowed for their initial success.

"Even though you might expect ecological processes to influence genetic and evolutionary ones, it has been shown very few times. It's an unusual thing to quantify, and, as far as we know, negative feedbacks haven't been demonstrated for other invaders," Davis says.

If garlic mustard becomes less aggressive over time, should landowners just leave it alone? Davis doesn't recommend a completely hands-off approach, but thinks landowners and managers should take a more holistic view of the ecosystems that garlic mustard invades.

"It may be satisfying to pull garlic mustard, but the damage you're doing to the herb layer by trampling it or by hosing it down with a chemical is probably worse than the garlic mustard itself. The main thing that creates space for garlic mustard is repeated disturbance. Landowners should try to minimize those disturbances and promote a healthy forest without micromanaging it," Davis suggests.

It might take decades to see garlic mustard fade out after its initial invasion, but Davis thinks there's reason to believe it will happen. "Ultimately," he says, "our results tell us we should have some faith in the ability of the ecosystem to achieve a new balance."

The article, "Evolutionary feedbacks on the ecology of the invasive plant Alliaria petiolata," is published in Functional Ecology.

Story Source:

The above post is reprinted from materials provided by University of Illinois College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.

Journal Reference:

Jeffrey A. Evans, Richard A. Lankau, Adam S. Davis, S. Raghu, Douglas A. Landis. Soil-mediated eco-evolutionary feedbacks in the invasive plantAlliaria petiolata. Functional Ecology, 2016; DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.12685
We travel the Milky way together, trees and men. - John Muir

Post Reply

Return to “Invasive Species and Tree Diseases”