Fracking Fluids Poison a National Forest

Discussions related to the issues of forest preservation and environmental conservation

Moderators: edfrank, dbhguru

Post Reply
User avatar
edfrank
Posts: 4217
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 5:46 pm

Fracking Fluids Poison a National Forest

Post by edfrank » Thu Jul 07, 2011 9:22 am

Fracking Fluids Poison a National Forest: New Study Details Changes in Soil Chemistry and Devastation of Trees and Plants



FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
July 6, 2011


CONTACT: Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER)
http://www.peer.org/

http://www.peer.org/news/news_id.php?row_id=1498

Kirsten Stade

Fracking Fluids Poison a National Forest
New Study Details Changes in Soil Chemistry and Devastation of Trees and Plants

WASHINGTON - July 6 - A new study has found that wastewater from natural gas hydrofracturing in a West Virginia national forest quickly wiped out all ground plants, killed more than half of the trees and caused radical changes in soil chemistry. These results argue for much tighter control over disposal of these "fracking fluids," contends Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER).

The new study by Mary Beth Adams, a U.S. Forest Service researcher, appears in the July-August issue of the peer-reviewed Journal of Environmental Quality. She looked at the effects of land application of fracking fluids on a quarter-acre section of the Fernow Experimental Forest within the Monongahela National Forest. More than 75,000 gallons of fracking fluids, which are injected deep underground to free shale gas and then return to the surface, were applied to the assigned plot over a two day period during June 2008. The following effects were reported in the study:

* Within two days all ground plants were dead;
* Within 10 days, leaves of trees began to turn brown. Within two years more than half of the approximately 150 trees were dead; and
* "Surface soil concentrations of sodium and chloride increased 50-fold as a result of the land application of hydrofracturing fluids…" These elevated levels eventually declined as chemical leached off-site. The exact chemical composition of these fluids is not known because the chemical formula is classified as confidential proprietary information.

"The explosion of shale gas drilling in the East has the potential to turn large stretches of public lands into lifeless moonscapes," stated PEER Executive Director Jeff Ruch, noting that land disposal of fracking fluids is common and in the case of the Fernow was done pursuant to a state permit. "This study suggests that these fluids should be treated as toxic waste."

For the past twenty-five years, the Forest Service has not applied any environmental restrictions on private extraction efforts, even in wilderness areas. As a result, forests, like the Monongahela, which sits astride the huge Marcellus Shale gas formation, have struggled with many adverse impacts of widespread drilling. By contrast, the nearby George Washington National Forest (NF) has recently proposed to ban horizontal drilling, a practice associated with hydrofracking, due to concern about both the ecosystem damage and also the huge amount of water required for the fracking process. Two subcommittees of the House of Representatives will hold a joint hearing this Friday to examine the George Washington NF's singular pro-conservation stance.

"Unfortunately, the Forest Service has drilled its head deeply into the sand on oil and gas operations harming forest assets," Ruch added, noting the National Wildlife Refuges also lack regulations to minimize drilling impacts. "The Forest Service needs to develop a broader approach than asking each forest supervisor to cast a lone profile in courage or cowardice."

###

See abstract of the fracking study https://www.agronomy.org/publications/j ... /40/4/1340

Look at drilling problems plaguing the Monongahela NF http://www.peer.org/news/news_id.php?row_id=1167

View lack of Forest Service oil & gas regulation on Eastern forests http://peer.org/news/news_id.php?row_id=1162

See proposed ban on horizontal drilling in the George Washington National Forest http://www.fs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOC ... 297828.pdf

Compare National Wildlife Refuge drilling policy vacuum http://www.peer.org/news/news_id.php?row_id=1473

###

Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) is a national alliance of local state and federal resource professionals. PEER's environmental work is solely directed by the needs of its members. As a consequence, we have the distinct honor of serving resource professionals who daily cast profiles in courage in cubicles across the country.


--
"I love science and it pains me to think that so many are terrified of the subject or feel that choosing science means you cannot also choose compassion, or the arts, or be awe by nature. Science is not meant to cure us of mystery, but to reinvent and revigorate it." by Robert M. Sapolsky

User avatar
James Parton
Posts: 1576
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2010 5:47 pm

Re: Fracking Fluids Poison a National Forest

Post by James Parton » Thu Jul 07, 2011 10:07 am

This practice should be banned and the fracking fluids classified as " toxic waste "!
James E Parton
Ovate Course Graduate - Druid Student
Bardic Mentor
New Order of Druids

http://www.druidcircle.org/nod/index.ph ... Itemid=145

User avatar
jamesrobertsmith
Posts: 906
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2010 5:32 am

Re: Fracking Fluids Poison a National Forest

Post by jamesrobertsmith » Thu Jul 07, 2011 11:49 am

Violence seems to be the only language that environmental rapists understand.

Post Reply

Return to “Forest Preservation and Conservation”