Cuyahoga Valley composite

Moderators: edfrank, dbhguru

Post Reply
User avatar
Steve Galehouse
Posts: 700
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 11:50 pm

Cuyahoga Valley composite

Post by Steve Galehouse » Tue Aug 23, 2011 6:30 pm

ENTS-

Rand Brown and I have measured several sites in the Cuyahoga Valley in the past couple of years, and I thought it would be interesting to combine the data in a separate post. Each of the four sites was once part of the Akron/Summit County Metropark system; now some of the sites are managed by the National Park system or jointly managed by NPS and Metroparks. All the sites are in northern Summit County and within a few miles of each other, and all share a common geography, with steep hills and ravines with small streams that lead into the Cuyahoga River. I look it as one continuous site that has been divided and disrupted by both urban and agricultural land use.

The composite data give a Rucker 5 index of 148.28, a Rucker 10 index 139.62, and a Rucker 20 index of 128.8---not too shabby!
Cuyahoga Valley composite.JPG
http://rev215.treesdb.org/Browse/Sites/627/Details

Steve
every plant is native somewhere

User avatar
dantheman9758
Posts: 52
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 1:55 pm

Re: Cuyahoga Valley composite

Post by dantheman9758 » Mon Sep 12, 2011 7:36 pm

Steve,

It looks like the Valley has a chance to hit over 140, incredible!, are there any "forests" north of the Ohio River (from any of the states) that have ever reached at or above 140?

I like how you've consolidated those nearby parks. They are all part of just one forest. I would like to believe most of the stretches of forest throughout the Western Reserve span multiple parks and properties. Google earth satellite maps reinforce this continuity.

Dan

Post Reply

Return to “Ohio”