Largest elm in NY

Moderators: edfrank, dbhguru

morgan
Posts: 103
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 9:34 am

Re: Largest elm in NY

Post by morgan » Wed Oct 09, 2013 4:06 am

Distance to top same as distance to base.

User avatar
Will Blozan
Posts: 1153
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:13 pm

Re: Largest elm in NY

Post by Will Blozan » Wed Oct 09, 2013 5:05 am

Morgan,

Ok, so you were 49.5 feet above the base? Or was the top leaning towards you proportionally so that 300 feet away you had an equilateral triangle? I am still not sure how you measured distance to top without a rangefinder other than cross-triangulation which would be a separate triangle than for the base.

Sorry, I am just trying to understand the premises here...

Will

morgan
Posts: 103
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 9:34 am

Re: Largest elm in NY

Post by morgan » Wed Oct 23, 2013 2:06 pm

I was the same distance from the base as I was from the point on the ground directly under the top.

morgan
Posts: 103
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 9:34 am

Re: Largest elm in NY

Post by morgan » Wed Oct 23, 2013 2:14 pm

As for the pic I posted on Oct 7, that is not going to work. When I got a better look, that top is not really higher it's just closer. The highest point on the tree is not visible from anywhere on the ground, because of the umbrella shape to the crown. I eventually gave up looking for the top and just stood right near the base and shot the Nikon 440 vertically a few dozen times, maybe 100 times, until I was convinced that 28.0 yards was the highest. I got 27.5 a bunch of times and 28 a bunch of times and I missed a bunch of times, but never got 28.5 so I was satisfied.

28 yards is 84 feet, and I'm 6 foot 4 and when I tip my head back like that my eye height is 6 foot 6 which adds up to 90.5 feet. The sidewalk is about .5 feet below the base so the tree is 90 feet tall.

That's my final answer. 90 feet.

User avatar
Will Blozan
Posts: 1153
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:13 pm

Re: Largest elm in NY

Post by Will Blozan » Wed Oct 23, 2013 4:30 pm

Morgan,

Thanks for the update. Sometimes shooting straight up is the best- or most accurate way- when the ground is flat. Elms are notoriously difficult!

Will

morgan
Posts: 103
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 9:34 am

Re: Largest elm in NY

Post by morgan » Wed Oct 23, 2013 6:58 pm

You got that right. Every time I tried to shoot the top with the Nikon, with the sine method or the cosine method, the top was closer than the base!!!!!!

Shooting straight up was the only way.

User avatar
dbhguru
Posts: 4467
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 9:34 pm

Re: Largest elm in NY

Post by dbhguru » Wed Oct 23, 2013 7:41 pm

Morgan,

Good explanation and thanks for your perseverance. I now wonder if the Old Deerfield, MA elm might not be a few feet higher because of its top being well inside its wide crown and not visible from where I commonly shoot the tree. Shooting straight up from beneath the tree when the leaves are off is a technique not to be discredited. Very useful. Bart Bouricius is especially good at finding the top of a broad-crowned hardwood this way. Any way, sounds like you've got that tree nailed.

Bob
Robert T. Leverett
Co-founder, Native Native Tree Society
Co-founder and President
Friends of Mohawk Trail State Forest
Co-founder, National Cadre

User avatar
tsharp
Posts: 413
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2010 12:04 pm

Re: Largest elm in NY

Post by tsharp » Wed Oct 23, 2013 8:04 pm

Morgan: I am still a little confused about your troubles with the Elm. When you say the top was closer than the base do you mean to you. ie.(the observer with a range finder)?
TS

User avatar
Will Blozan
Posts: 1153
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:13 pm

Re: Largest elm in NY

Post by Will Blozan » Thu Oct 24, 2013 6:23 am

Morgan,

Yeah, it is entirely possible the highest point could be well out from the "base" on a lateral branch. This was the case on a huge cedar of Lebanon in VA I measured in 2006. The highest point after tons of searching was way out almost at the edge of the crown spread. Other parts "looked" taller but the laser does not lie.

Measuring a tree is simply defining the vertical distance between two points. There is no- and never has been- any relationship between the two points with regard to how they are measured. Forget the tree- it is not the slightest factor whatsoever in the measurement protocol. If you find yourself wondering why the top is so far off the base you are no longer on task.

Will

User avatar
dbhguru
Posts: 4467
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 9:34 pm

Re: Largest elm in NY

Post by dbhguru » Thu Oct 24, 2013 7:13 am

Will,

This lesson is a very hard one for people to accept, especially those who work with trees, if their focus is the trunk. We're battling decades of habit. How many clinometers are out there with manufacturer diagrams that show a level baseline to the trunk in their height diagrams? It seems so natural to set the baseline from eye to trunk - unfortunately.

Bob
Robert T. Leverett
Co-founder, Native Native Tree Society
Co-founder and President
Friends of Mohawk Trail State Forest
Co-founder, National Cadre

Post Reply

Return to “New York”